Skip to main content
#Title
1The Pearsall Building
2The Opening Ceremony of The River Laboratory
3The Ferry Boat, Windermere
4Inflating the Lund Tubes
5An aerial photograph of The Ferry House prior to the construction of The Pearsall Building
6Advertisement for the Letting of The Ferry Inn
7Assessment of the performance of the BMWP scoring system against biological targets and the determination of significant change
8Aerial view of the River Laboratory
9Reed cutter used at the River Lab
10Bioaccumulation of metals in the Thames Estuary
11A demonstration of the use of a framework for the ecological risk assessment of land contamination
12Biological assessment of the effects of Ivybridge Sewage Treatment Works on the River Erme
13Using Macrophytes for the Environmental Assessment of Rivers: The Role of Sediment Nutrients
14The influence of zinc sulphate solution on the fauna of chalk stream channels
15Report on the control of discharges of titanium dioxide waste to the Humber Estuary : appendices
16Biological Assessment Methods: Controlling the Quality of Biological Data. Package 1 The variability of data used for assessing the biological condition of rivers
17Survey of the biological quality of creek systems in the outer Thames Estuary, with special reference to the impact of STW and landfill site discharges
18NRA report of the blue-green algal monitoring 1990 : a report by the toxic blue-green algae task group
19A biological investigation of the affects of discharges from Meldon quarry on the West Okemont River - 8/08/89 and 20/09/89
20The biology of the sea trout. Summary of a symposium held at Plas Menai 24-26 October 1984
21Assessment of the feasibility of using image analysis in the oyster embryo-larval development and daphnia magna growth tests
22Development of Operational and Policy Guidance on the Use of Hydrogen Peroxide
23Guidance on the use of Bioassays in Ecological Risk Assessment
24Assessing and controlling the ecotoxicity of complex effluents
25Quality audit of biological samples for the 1990 river quality survey